2 CAR § 1-203. Selection criteria

        2 CAR § 1-203. Selection criteria.

        (a)(1) In order to achieve certain goals and priorities, applications will particularly be reviewed for the following criteria.

                (2) Each will receive a weighted score, the maximum of which is indicated.

                (3) The sum total score of all the criteria will be used to rank competing applications.

        (b) Capital improvement grant criteria:

                (1) Portion of feedstock grown in Arkansas to be used for alternative fuels production, fifteen (15) points;

                (2) Portion of feedstock processed in Arkansas to be used for alternative fuels production, fifteen (15) points;

                (3) Share of capital investment from equity investors, ten (10) points;

                (4) Share of equity investment from Arkansas investors, ten (10) points;

                (5) Suitability of the alternative fuel to be produced for utilization in the Arkansas fuel economy, ten (10) points;

                (6) Technical capability of the management team, fifteen (15) points;

                (7) New jobs and positions added to the Arkansas rural economy, ten (10) points; and

                (8) Evidence company has in place established quality standards and practices, fifteen (15) points.

        (c) Operating cost grant criteria:

                (1) Evidence that applicant and facility will be long-term suppliers of alternative fuels to the Arkansas economy, twenty (20) points;   

                (2) Evidence that quality of volume for which claim is made met ASTM International standards, fifteen (15) points;   

                (3) Evidence that applicant attempted to maximize use of feedstock grown or processed in Arkansas, twenty (20) points;   

                (4) Evidence that applicant has sound marketing plan in place and is attempting to maximize marketing benefits, fifteen (15) points;   

                (5) Evidence that applicant has a plan in place to maintain costs at competitive levels, fifteen (15) points; and

                (6) Evidence company has in place established quality standards and practices, fifteen (15) points.



	
		
		
		<style type="text/css">
			.cs619A0A30{text-align:left;text-indent:0pt;margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0pt;line-height:1.65}
			.csCCA19CAA{color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-family:Tahoma,Arial;font-size:12pt;font-weight:bold;font-style:normal;}
			.cs1E246FCB{color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-family:Tahoma,Arial;font-size:12pt;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;}
		</style>
	
	
		<p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="csCCA19CAA">        2 CAR &sect; 1-203. Selection criteria.</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">        (a)(1) In order to achieve certain goals and priorities, applications will particularly be reviewed for the following criteria. </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (2) Each will receive a weighted score, the maximum of which is indicated. </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (3) The sum total score of all the criteria will be used to rank competing applications.</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">        (b) Capital improvement grant criteria:</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (1) Portion of feedstock grown in Arkansas to be used for alternative fuels production, fifteen (15) points;</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (2) Portion of feedstock processed in Arkansas to be used for alternative fuels production, fifteen (15) points; </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (3) Share of capital investment from equity investors, ten (10) points; </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (4) Share of equity investment from Arkansas investors, ten (10) points; </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (5) Suitability of the alternative fuel to be produced for utilization in the Arkansas fuel economy, ten (10) points; </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (6) Technical capability of the management team, fifteen (15) points; </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (7) New jobs and positions added to the Arkansas rural economy, ten (10) points; and </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (8) Evidence company has in place established quality standards and practices, fifteen (15) points. </span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">        (c) Operating cost grant criteria:</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (1) Evidence that applicant and facility will be long-term suppliers of alternative fuels to the Arkansas economy, twenty (20) points; &nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (2) Evidence that quality of volume for which claim is made met ASTM International standards, fifteen (15) points; &nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (3) Evidence that applicant attempted to maximize use of feedstock grown or processed in Arkansas, twenty (20) points; &nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (4) Evidence that applicant has sound marketing plan in place and is attempting to maximize marketing benefits, fifteen (15) points; &nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (5) Evidence that applicant has a plan in place to maintain costs at competitive levels, fifteen (15) points; and</span></p><p class="cs619A0A30"><span class="cs1E246FCB">                (6) Evidence company has in place established quality standards and practices, fifteen (15) points. </span></p>

No notes are currently available.
Arkansas Code § 15-13-305